Some Muslim and Red mock ups

[MickDundee80 Profile]

And I thought the Reds were never racist :)

[Black Knight]

And I thought the Reds were never racist :)

Mick, where did you get the photo of the guy holding up the "Kill the Jews" sign?  Where was the photo taken?

[MickDundee80 Profile]

And I thought the Reds were never racist :)

Mick, where did you get the photo of the guy holding up the "Kill the Jews" sign?  Where was the photo taken?

Haha, its fake BK. The sign originally said "Boycott Israel". I put "Kill The Jews" as a mockery of the Reds'
hypocritically calling other people racist while expressing deeply anti-Semetic views.

They support Palestine against Israel because Israel is richer and Palestine is seen as the "underdog".

Lefties and Reds always support the underdog over the power regardless of who is right.

Personally I can't wait for the Isralies to wipe the Palestinians out. I wish the yanks would get the hell
out of their way and let them get on with a good deed.

[mutation Profile]

And I thought the Reds were never racist :)

Mick, where did you get the photo of the guy holding up the "Kill the Jews" sign?  Where was the photo taken?

Haha, its fake BK. The sign originally said "Boycott Israel". I put "Kill The Jews" as a mockery of the Reds'
hypocritically calling other people racist while expressing deeply anti-Semetic views.

They support Palestine against Israel because Israel is richer and Palestine is seen as the "underdog".

Lefties and Reds always support the underdog over the power regardless of who is right.

Personally I can't wait for the Isralies to wipe the Palestinians out. I wish the yanks would get the hell
out of their way and let them get on with a good deed.

Mick I dont think there is much sense in you trying to tell BK what Reds do! I think he might know!


Mutation

[Black Knight]

And I thought the Reds were never racist :)

Mick, where did you get the photo of the guy holding up the "Kill the Jews" sign?  Where was the photo taken?

Haha, its fake BK. The sign originally said "Boycott Israel". I put "Kill The Jews" as a mockery of the Reds' hypocritically calling other people racist while expressing deeply anti-Semetic views.

You certainly fooled me.

By the way, just because Reds are critical of Zionists doesn't make them necessarily anti-Semitic, does it?

Personally I can't wait for the Isralies to wipe the Palestinians out. I wish the yanks would get the hell
out of their way and let them get on with a good deed.

Wipe them out?  That's a bit extreme, Mick.  Now why would that be a good deed? Surely the Palestinians have suffered enough from the Israelis.

[MickDundee80 Profile]

And I thought the Reds were never racist :)

Mick, where did you get the photo of the guy holding up the "Kill the Jews" sign?  Where was the photo taken?

Haha, its fake BK. The sign originally said "Boycott Israel". I put "Kill The Jews" as a mockery of the Reds' hypocritically calling other people racist while expressing deeply anti-Semetic views.

You certainly fooled me.

By the way, just because Reds are critical of Zionists doesn't make them necessarily anti-Semitic, does it?

Personally I can't wait for the Isralies to wipe the Palestinians out. I wish the yanks would get the hell
out of their way and let them get on with a good deed.

Wipe them out?  That's a bit extreme, Mick.  Now why would that be a good deed? Surely the Palestinians have suffered enough from the Israelis.

Go to a Socialist Alternative meeting BK, and you'll see what I mean. They are clearly anti-Jew.

And no its not extreme. I don't think you're getting it buddy. This isn't the first pawn moved. We're fairly
close to the Western world's end game. They are the enemy. They want to wipe us out because we aren't Muslim. They are intolerant of anyone not Muslim. At least the Israelies aren't under a religious
mandate to rape, kill, invade, and mass-slaughter until their religion dominates the world.

So yes, let the Jews do it.

[Black Knight]

And I thought the Reds were never racist :)

Mick, where did you get the photo of the guy holding up the "Kill the Jews" sign?  Where was the photo taken?

Haha, its fake BK. The sign originally said "Boycott Israel". I put "Kill The Jews" as a mockery of the Reds' hypocritically calling other people racist while expressing deeply anti-Semetic views.

You certainly fooled me.

By the way, just because Reds are critical of Zionists doesn't make them necessarily anti-Semitic, does it?

Personally I can't wait for the Isralies to wipe the Palestinians out. I wish the yanks would get the hell
out of their way and let them get on with a good deed.

Wipe them out?  That's a bit extreme, Mick.  Now why would that be a good deed? Surely the Palestinians have suffered enough from the Israelis.

Go to a Socialist Alternative meeting BK, and you'll see what I mean. They are clearly anti-Jew.

Anti-Jew or anti-Zionist?  I.e. are they anti-Semitic outside a Zionist context?  I don't think so.

And no its not extreme. I don't think you're getting it buddy. This isn't the first pawn moved. We're fairly close to the Western world's end game. They are the enemy. They want to wipe us out because we aren't Muslim. They are intolerant of anyone not Muslim.

I thought we were talking about Palestinians, not Muslims in general.  And what about Christian Palestinians, do you want them wiped out too?  And besides Muslims aren't much of a threat if they're confined to their own native countries.

At least the Israelies aren't under a religious mandate to rape, kill, invade, and mass-slaughter until their religion dominates the world.

So yes, let the Jews do it.

What, you mean commit mass murder?

[mutation Profile]

This "debate" is getting tired!


Mutation

[Black Knight]

This "debate" is getting tired!


Mutation

How so?

[MickDundee80 Profile]

This "debate" is getting tired!


Mutation

How so?

Yes it is getting tired, I'm over it. Bottom line BK, as soon as Muslims get nuclear weapons, its going to be
a global nuclar holocaust because they believe dying to kill the "infidels" will send them to paradise.

They won't be afraid of the retaliation. Mostly because they're inbred and mentally unstable, but also
because their faith says it will be wonderful after.

If there aren't any Muslims, they can't get nukes. Are you getting the picture?

And yes Reds are anti-Semetic, they just use the Palestinian/Israeli conflict as a cover.

Don't want to discuss it anymore as we obviously don't agree. Would be just talking in circles.

[mutation Profile]

This "debate" is getting tired!


Mutation

How so?

Recon mick just answered that for you.
I get it Genocide is not a palatable concept for you I understand it is naughty bla bla bla but I cant think of another policy that might induce Moderate muslims to rise up against the militant ones and if they are not motivated to do so the only choices will me genocide or surrender. I know which I can live with.

Mutation

[Black Knight]

This "debate" is getting tired!


Mutation

How so?

Recon mick just answered that for you.

Mick just doesn't want to hear anything that goes against his own preconceptions.

I get it Genocide is not a palatable concept for you I understand it is naughty bla bla bla but I cant think of another policy that might induce Moderate muslims to rise up against the militant ones and if they are not motivated to do so the only choices will me genocide or surrender. I know which I can live with.

Your advocacy of genocide would only make moderate and militant Moslems stick closer together.  This kind of amoral thinking is what I have come to expect from an atheist such as yourself.  But advocating genocide is not just "naughty", Mutation, it is also against the rules of this forum.  Consider:

38. There must be no instigation, approval of, planning of, or suggestions to illegal activity at the board of any sort. Illegal is considered whatever is illegal under the municipal, state, and federal jurisdictions of this server, as well as what is illegal under International Law. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, slander, libel, illegal defamation, and illegal threats against identifiable persons or groups; and instigation, approval of, planning of, or suggestions to genocide or other criminal measures, whether in the past, present, or future.

[MickDundee80 Profile]

This "debate" is getting tired!


Mutation

How so?

Recon mick just answered that for you.

Mick just doesn't want to hear anything that goes against his own preconceptions.

I get it Genocide is not a palatable concept for you I understand it is naughty bla bla bla but I cant think of another policy that might induce Moderate muslims to rise up against the militant ones and if they are not motivated to do so the only choices will me genocide or surrender. I know which I can live with.

Your advocacy of genocide would only make moderate and militant Moslems stick closer together.  This kind of amoral thinking is what I have come to expect from an atheist such as yourself.  But advocating genocide is not just "naughty", Mutation, it is also against the rules of this forum.  Consider:

38. There must be no instigation, approval of, planning of, or suggestions to illegal activity at the board of any sort. Illegal is considered whatever is illegal under the municipal, state, and federal jurisdictions of this server, as well as what is illegal under International Law. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, slander, libel, illegal defamation, and illegal threats against identifiable persons or groups; and instigation, approval of, planning of, or suggestions to genocide or other criminal measures, whether in the past, present, or future.

As much as your socialist leanings would love to censor us for "thought crimes", this forum is not a fascist
Commie dictatorship. People are allowed to voice opinions that YOU don't agree with.

As for radical and moderate Muslims banding together, oh god no! You mean the 5% of Muslims are going
to join with the other 95% of radical or radical sympathizers. What will we do without that 5% of Muslims!

We're doomed! Seriously, you just don't get it. Islam does not want to co-exist. It wants total domination
of all lands and people that are not already Islamic. Muslims are the ultimate supremacists.

If you think its anything but My-Way-Or-The-Highway with them, you are gravely naive about their
intentions. Seriously, I'm not actually trying to be insulting here. Just calling Islam for what it is.

Its like saying there are "moderate" Great White Sharks that have sworn off human flesh, and its only the
"radical" sharks that will eat you. Come brass balls time, who do you think the "moderate" Muslims will side
with? They will preach tolerance so long as it suits them, and the next day, cut your throat if their people
go to war with ours.

Even back when kings would marry off their daughters to foreign princes to strengthen military and political ties, the two nations didn't suddenly join hands and sing "We are the world". Even then they
didn't trust each other much more than before the marriage, they just had an agreement of convenience.

Truth is, tribes never trust each other, and they never will completely. There's a reason for that.
The tribes that did trust - our ancestors killed them all. Its in our DNA not to trust that which is not
readily known to us. Its what kept us alive. This is why multiculturalism will never work.

[Black Knight]

This "debate" is getting tired!


Mutation

How so?

Recon mick just answered that for you.

Mick just doesn't want to hear anything that goes against his own preconceptions.

I get it Genocide is not a palatable concept for you I understand it is naughty bla bla bla but I cant think of another policy that might induce Moderate muslims to rise up against the militant ones and if they are not motivated to do so the only choices will me genocide or surrender. I know which I can live with.

Your advocacy of genocide would only make moderate and militant Moslems stick closer together.  This kind of amoral thinking is what I have come to expect from an atheist such as yourself.  But advocating genocide is not just "naughty", Mutation, it is also against the rules of this forum.  Consider:

38. There must be no instigation, approval of, planning of, or suggestions to illegal activity at the board of any sort. Illegal is considered whatever is illegal under the municipal, state, and federal jurisdictions of this server, as well as what is illegal under International Law. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, slander, libel, illegal defamation, and illegal threats against identifiable persons or groups; and instigation, approval of, planning of, or suggestions to genocide or other criminal measures, whether in the past, present, or future.

As much as your socialist leanings would love to censor us for "thought crimes", this forum is not a fascist
Commie dictatorship. People are allowed to voice opinions that YOU don't agree with.

I've got news for you Mick but there are limits to free speech on this forum.  I suggest you check out the rules.  If you have any objections then you should refer them to the Global Moderator or Darrin.

As for radical and moderate Muslims banding together, oh god no! You mean the 5% of Muslims are going to join with the other 95% of radical or radical sympathizers. What will we do without that 5% of Muslims!

Flushing out the moderate Muslims was Mutie's idea, not mine.  What I was referring to was the unengaged Muslims.  Muslims that just want to get along with their life and not attack anyone.  Making an enemy out of them in their own countries is senseless.

We're doomed! Seriously, you just don't get it. Islam does not want to co-exist. It wants total domination of all lands and people that are not already Islamic. Muslims are the ultimate supremacists.

If you think its anything but My-Way-Or-The-Highway with them, you are gravely naive about their intentions. Seriously, I'm not actually trying to be insulting here. Just calling Islam for what it is.

Its like saying there are "moderate" Great White Sharks that have sworn off human flesh, and its only the "radical" sharks that will eat you. Come brass balls time, who do you think the "moderate" Muslims will side with? They will preach tolerance so long as it suits them, and the next day, cut your throat if their people go to war with ours.

Mick, there is nothing you can tell me about Islam and Muslims that I don't know already but if you think that Jews and Israelis suppressing ordinary Muslim Palestinians is in any way helping the West, then you've got a lot to learn, buddy.

Truth is, tribes never trust each other, and they never will completely. There's a reason for that.  The tribes that did trust - our ancestors killed them all. Its in our DNA not to trust that which is not readily known to us. Its what kept us alive. This is why multiculturalism will never work.

More news, Mick!  We in the West no longer live in tribes.  We live in nations.  Contrary to what you believe, tribes that did trust each other amalgamated and as a superior force were able to overcome their weaker neighbours.  It is that which has kept us alive.

[mutation Profile]

This "debate" is getting tired!


Mutation

How so?

Recon mick just answered that for you.

Mick just doesn't want to hear anything that goes against his own preconceptions.

I get it Genocide is not a palatable concept for you I understand it is naughty bla bla bla but I cant think of another policy that might induce Moderate muslims to rise up against the militant ones and if they are not motivated to do so the only choices will me genocide or surrender. I know which I can live with.

Your advocacy of genocide would only make moderate and militant Moslems stick closer together.  This kind of amoral thinking is what I have come to expect from an atheist such as yourself.  But advocating genocide is not just "naughty", Mutation, it is also against the rules of this forum.  Consider:

38. There must be no instigation, approval of, planning of, or suggestions to illegal activity at the board of any sort. Illegal is considered whatever is illegal under the municipal, state, and federal jurisdictions of this server, as well as what is illegal under International Law. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, slander, libel, illegal defamation, and illegal threats against identifiable persons or groups; and instigation, approval of, planning of, or suggestions to genocide or other criminal measures, whether in the past, present, or future.

Your point is what exactly?
I have simply suggested it as an hypothetical response one of many possible responses to the situation! I have not advocated or tried to make it a reality or tried to manipulate anybody else into doing so!
If you were pissing someone off and you became aware that they were not only going to kill you but every single person in your family,tribe,nation,country etc might it not tend to moderate your behavior? Would it not send a strong message just like nuclear capability does? You dont have to drop a nuke to make your point or benifit from having it you simple need to create a situation where your enemy is 100% convinced that you will if pushed. A "promise" of genocide would have a similar effect because it demonstrates the resolve you have and the lengths to which you are willing to go to prevail.
Your morality on the subject i suspect is as thin as most peoples are given the right stimulus. Hypothetically speaking if you had to kill to save yourself you would! If you had to kill a whole family to save yours you would! If you had to kill a country to save yours you would! yet you claim that you wont kill a culture to save your own! Right there is the disconnect, right there is the lie, right there is the gaping hole in your morality! All you are lacking is the stimulus to take action!
If a word or Idea can be deemed taboo and hence never discussed then they have one and you helped them.
The fact that you seem to support that level of verbal censorship make my suspicions about you and your ideology all the more likely.
Genocide is even to a morally bereft character like myself abhorrent but IF it is the only option that can prevail and IF the alternative is submission then it is in my opinion a valid one. It may be not be a valid one in this example and if not you can convince me its not but you cant tell me not to discuss it!

I love the way if you dare use the G word people jump all over you out of some post Holocaust guilt but  the nuclear capability of both the USSR and USA for half a century had it ever been tested would effectively rendered  a Genocide and nobody turned a hair! Where were your lefty morals on genocide when you beloved Mother Russia was building factories under mountains so that after they had killed all the evil Americans they would still have a nuclear capability to spread the destruction further?


Mutation